November 12, 2007

Oldest Main Street house owner "shocked" **updated at 2:15 Monday**

Without providing the public any opportunity to protest the decision, the city knocked down the oldest house on Main Street last week.
“It’s unbelievable. I’m in total shock,” its owner, Ken Karl, said Monday. “There’s no other word but bizarre.”
City officials and Karl have clashed for years over the slow pace of renovations on the Federal-style house at 313 Main St. which the Plymouth developer moved across the street in 2004 to save it when a library expansion project threatened it.
It appears that city building officials, who have been under pressure from politicians for years to crack down on Karl, condemned the house some weeks ago. But the records were unavailable Monday, because of the holiday, and departmental officials could not be reached.
Mayor William Stortz said the house was deemed unsafe by the city building department. "It was condemned," he said.
Stortz said Karl was given the chance to bring city officials a plan for correcting the problems.
"Apparently he didn't," said Stortz, who said Karl's overall project was "woefully inadequate."
Karl, who learned about the destruction of the house two days after it lay in ruins, said there was more than $40,000 worth of donated material inside, include high-end kitchen cabinetry, that’s apparently gone.
“That house was filled to the gills,” Karl said.
Karl said he had no idea the city had any intention of razing the building it sold to him for $1 back in 2004 when he saved it from the wrecking ball. The city had planned to knock the house down in order to have more parking for the library.
He said, though, that he received a certified letter a few weeks ago that warned him the house would be demolished if he didn’t take measures to satisfy the building department’s concerns. Karl said he didn’t take it too seriously and thought it “was really weird.”
“I just assumed they were blowing smoke again,” Karl said, because the letter offered no avenues for appeal and appeared to be so far over the top that he couldn’t imagine that it was a legitimate threat.
He said that it appears the city government operates “in an alternative universe where there is no due process” and its decisions can’t be challenged or questioned.
“This is really sad,” Karl said, calling the destruction “the Bill Stortz retirement act.”
Karl said that the current troubles began about a month and a half ago.
He said he was “just working away on the house” when building department officials stopped in and told him he needed a different building permit to keep going with the work, one for a single-family home home. A new building code had changed some rules, Karl was told, but copies of it were not available.
Karl said he got hit with a “stop work” order on the house on September 22, the same day he applied for the permits.
After that, he met a few times with city officials at City Hall and at the house. Karl said he was “jumping” for Building Official Guy Morin, but kept having new roadblocks thrown in his way.
Sometime after that, Karl said, officials raised questions about the plans he had for the steel beams holding up the house, which were new, and a back wall that had been vandalized. He said he supplied plans, but officials apparently were not satisfied with them.
Karl said, though, that he took out a mortgage on the property this year and it passed inspection for that. A structural engineer in Hartford also presented plans that showed the house was safe, he said.
He said he considered the ongoing spat with the building office “minor” because he was looking at a long-term project to restore the house “on a budget” over the course of years.
Why that plan was cut short, he said, he doesn’t understand.
Stortz said that once officials were aware of the problem, the city "had to do something.”
What happens next is unclear.
“I’m definitely not going to become a rice planter with my new empty lot,” Karl said. “I may go up there and plant some flowers.”

History of the house
The Federal-style house the city razed last week was built about 1820 by one of Bristol’s early clockmakers, researchers said.
Cheryl Barb, a Federal Hill resident with a passion for historic preservation, found that a slew of prominent Bristol residents have lived in the house over the years, including 19th century notables Titus Roberts, Elisha Brewster, Joseph Camp, David Hawley and Dr. Roswell Hawley and his widow Jane Hawley.
Roswell Hawley was a son of Joseph Roswell Hawley, a prominent Civil War general and former governor.
More recently, it was the childhood home of artist Glo Sessions.

The fate of other historic houses
2007 – A Farmington Avenue farmhouse that had stood for more than 200 years was hauled away in pieces to allow construction of a new Taco Bell.
2006 – Lake Compounce ripped down the 200-year-old homestead of Gad Norton, the founder of the nation’s oldest amusement park because it wanted to put a storage barn on the Lake Avenue site.
2002 – Two historic houses near St. Mathew’s Church in Forestville were demolished for a church complex that hasn’t yet been built.
2001 – The Bristol Housing Authority knocked down the 215-year-old Mark Lewis house on Jerome Avenue to make way for a new administrative office.


*******
Copyright 2007. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com

31 comments:

Anonymous said...

Secrecy = Evil.
It will be interesting to see whose fingerprints are on this.
It'll be revealing, but the sad fact is, the house is gone and nothing can bring it back.

Anonymous said...

This town's continued lack of respect for its own history is just despicable.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, where are all the people who love to moan about the old downtown and the old post office and all that when this is happening? Nobody cares. They vow it won't happen again, but it happens all too often.

Anonymous said...

The city didn't even have the decency to notify the owner? Shame on everyone involved.

Anonymous said...

Disgusting.

Steve Collins said...

From Frank Johnson:
The Bristol Historical Society continues to seek grants and to build membership and hold fund raisers in order to continue to renovate and operate the building at Summer and Center Streets. Total cost for that little project, saving the original Bristol High School Building, will probably exceed $2 million by the time it is complete. That is why I continue to serve as Chairman of the Building Committee that struggles to put grant money to the best possible use. This Saturday I will be among the crew unloading Christmas trees for our annual fund raising event. Hardly what I would call being a big shot.

While BHS is sympathetic to saving old structures and in fact tried very hard to save the Norton house, our influence is limited, as is our funding. With all of the public outrage over the Norton House being torn down, BHS requested support in the form of funding and less than $250 was pledged. Well intentioned people want to save historic structures but the funding is never there. We did take an interest in the Main Street structure but we did not have the funding to buy it or a use for it.

Saving buildings, other than our own, is not the mission of BHS. It used to be the mission of the Bristol Historic Preservation Trust which was well intentioned but also lacked funding and is no longer in existence as far as I know.

Criticize the BHS if you wish but even the Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation, a group charged with saving historic structures stated that the BHS saved the original Bristol High School circa 1895 from the inevitable wrecking ball. The old building was once on their list of “Most Endangered Historic Structures”.

It is true that Bristol has always lacked a “Preservation Ethic.” I am not sure why. People are happy to bitch on a blog and try to place blame on the Library, the Mayor, the City Council, the Historical Society and countless individuals but the fact is that groups like BHS struggle for membership and for dollars to do preservation work. If everyone who entered a complaint about the loss of this structure left their keyboard, got off their ass and joined the BHS (http://www.bristolhistoricalsociety.org) or started a historic preservation group they could say they were part of the solution. By sitting back and whining you are a part of the problem.

Anonymous said...

Well said Frank.....

Anonymous said...

classy release from Frank Johnson. real leaders rise to the occasion, they don't lash out.

maybe if the Zoning Commission was responsive to its own rules and public wishes, then maybe the public would feel like they can make a difference. but the truth is that the public feels like no matter what they do, they can't make a difference because of decisions by the Zoning Commission, the Board of Education, etc. that give little regard to what the public wants.

Anonymous said...

Was the owner notified?
Why would the public have to be notified?
Did the city do all the proper and legal things?
Did the owner do as he promised or agreed to?
Were there other issues: safety, liability, legal, economic?

Should make for interesting discussion at the Tuesday City council meeting.

Hopefully all the lawyers will be present.

Anonymous said...

What does Mayor Stortz have to say about this? He should have some information on this for you.

Anonymous said...

Frank Johnson's post was most likely meant for the original blog listing on this topic where he and Ellen Zoppo, and the Historic Soceity were getting killed for no reason.

Anonymous said...

So it was a "stop work" order from the City Building Inspector? Hmm. When the city Building Inspector issued a "stop work" order against Walgreens, the great heroic preservationist and Zoning Chairman Frank Johnson worked to override it successfully. If Johnson cares so much about preservation, why didn't he work to override this "stop work" order too since it would ultimatelly end badly? Maybe because he goes the extra mile for business developers, whereas this Ken Karl guy was just a regular person and not worth Johnson's efforts?

Anonymous said...

Thanks, Steve and Jackie, for looking into this. I may not like everything you do, but you have tried to encourage historic preservation by shining a light on the issue for many years. It's not your fault that even the city government itself doesn't give a damn about Bristol's heritage!

Anonymous said...

The zoning laws allow the ZB to consider the nature of the surrounding neigborhood and impacts on that neighborhood when projects are approved or disapproved.

Maybe IF the Johnson and the Zoning Board considered the fact that the Chauncey Jerome Home (aka. Elk's Club) and the South End National Register Historic District consisting of about 130 historic buildings) were DIRECTLY across the street from that disgusting Walgreens Drug store project,
Bristol would be perceived as having a "Preservation Ethic".
Others would be induced to engage in the effort.

Preservation is more than running out to "save" an endangered building from demolition.
That is the very last step - a step of despiration.

The ZB should support the hard won first step. They need to recognize the significance of the National Register districts and properties in our community in their actual governance of Bristol's affairs.

Allowing for variances and exceptions to build fake second floors and approving disgusting bricked-up windows which are an insult to any notion of pedestrian friendly, is not supportive of those first steps, in any way.

It is an insult to that very difficult first step which involves gaining of the federal recognition for the architectural significance and integrity of an historic district or building, to begin with.

Johnson and the ZB undermined Bristol's architecural and historical resources when they approved that Walgreens project.

How is that drug store development designed to be compatible with a pedestrian friendly streetscape in a traditional urban area or even supportive and compatible with an adjacent historic buildings or district ?

Frankly, national drug store chains have alternate designs for their drug stores. They pull them out of the drawer if the local ZB insists and cares about such matters.

If Bristol is perceived as not having a "Preservation Ethic" that has taken root in our community, one need look no further than the decisions and actions of the ZB.

Anonymous said...

He got a letter saying it would be demolished, but he didn't think they were serious and now he is surprised?

This guy is a flake.

Anonymous said...

JUST GOES TO SHOW THE TAX PAYERS IN BRISTOL WE HAVE NO SAY. LOOK AT THE RESULTS AT THE POLLS A BIG NO SHOW .WHEN WERE NOT HEARD WHY BOTHER. ITS NOT GOING TO CHANGE HERE.SELL AND LET WELFARE TAKE OVER. SIX MONTHS BRISTOL WILL BE IN BIG TROUBLE.

Anonymous said...

The taxpayers do have a say.
As was shown on election day, they choose not to speak out or act when it counts, but would rather whine on the Internet.
They can go to meetings and speak up, they can choose to get involved.
The choice is theirs.

As regards the demolition, it had to be posted, but the city does not have to put it in the paper.
The owner could have called or Emailed the media, but apparently chose not to.

Anonymous said...

What good is it for taxpayers to go to Zoning Commission meetings when the Chairmen have a secret meeting with developers to thrwart the rules and the enforcement of rules by the City Building Inspector?

Anonymous said...

Bob Beaudreau: You need to make things more fashionable on Federal Hill. You can do it!

Anonymous said...

To Anonymous Poster at 8:29p

It is NOT about making Federal Hill or for that matter any section of town "fashionable"....

What I strive for and would hope others join me in doing is making Bristol a place where we can all be PROUD....

PROUD of where we live regardless of whether you live on Federal Hill, in Forestville, on the East Side or West Side, on Chippens Hill....wherever.......

PROUD of where we work,

PROUD of where we play

and ultimately....

PROUD of ourselves for what we are and the fact that we can and WILL come together as a community to make our City a greater place than it is already.

I challenge everyone to come out and VOLUNTEER to do even the slightest thing to make our City a greater place!

I have the faith that WE can all work together....

Anonymous said...

Aren't registered letters supposed to be sent to the Historic Society and and notices posted at the property if an historic house is going to be demolished?

Anonymous said...

Ken was notified by certified mail and admitted that he was notified. He also said he did not take the letter seriously! A prudent person would have contacted their legal counsel for advice. Somehow I don't think this was a not scribbled on a piece of scrap paper but a formal letter on legal letter head. I also wonder how much of that $40,000 worth of materials was actually in the building. This house and it's owner have been on the real estate committee's agenda on a regular basis as counselors tried to get Ken to meet his obligations of the contract. Ken was dragging his feet. City leaders need to address several blight/crime issues in the Main st/Summer St. area......this was a good start. I for one was tired of looking at this house sitting there with nothing being done to it. Historic or not a contract is a contract. We are moving forward on downtown......finally. This guy just missed the bus. He has no one to blame but himself.

Anonymous said...

I would have no problem with the city taking the house back from Ken Karl. But knocking it down? What kind of city tears down one of its oldest houses? It's like dumping gold in the Pequabuck or running a steamroller over all our police cars. It's just pure waste.
I'm no fan of Karl's, but what the city did is so unbelievably stupid that I haven't got the words to express my horror at it.

Anonymous said...

Hopefully the city will now take action on the "empty" lot two doors down.
It is a mess, cars, junk, trailers etc.
Who do they know to get away with that?

Anonymous said...

Two people Bill Stortz hated more in this world were Art Ward and Frank Johnson.

Now he's buddies with both of them.

Anonymous said...

Maybe he didn't hate them.
Maybe he just didn't always agree with them.
Maybe you can learn from that, that genuine and legitimate disagreement is not hate, and that adults can go on and still work together.
Maybe that shows that stortz wants what is best for the city as do ward and frank johnson do.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Karl's lack of respect for old homes is despicable! Let's put the responsibility where it belongs. This man chose to do nothing with this home for three years and thumbed his nose at letters from the city. Enough is enough. I'm glad they tore it down. It was an eyesore and he obviously didn't have the means nor the desire to fix it up the way it should have been.

Anonymous said...

Apparently you people never looked inside this home. It was a RAT HOLE!!! Any integrity that this house once had has been stripped away. My understanding is the building was so deteriorated from lack of care that it was falling down. This man did not take his obligations seriously. Maybe now when someone is sent a letter from the city, they won't disregard it as nonsense. That's the problem with people in this town, especially landlords. They don't take our laws and zoning seriously. Well, maybe they'll think twice about ignoring the city when it speaks.

Anonymous said...

Considering our own Zoning Commission chairman Frank Johnson has apparently allowed the bending and breaking of zoning rules, ignored the warnings by the professioanl city planner, and held at least 1 secret meeting with a developer to work on overriding the decision of the city's chief building inspector, it's small wonder why people feel the way they do.

Anonymous said...

Yeah,
and he gets rewarded for it by becoming chairman at the the BDDC while still remaining chairman of ZB!

Can you imagine what the future downtown is going to look like when he starts his scheming again?

Eyesore city.

Anonymous said...

Whose choice was Franks Johnson???