August 17, 2009

Councilors ready to lop off some heads

When city councilors endorsed the $159,000 widening of Center Street last week, they thought the state was picking up the tab.
It isn’t.
The money is actually coming entirely from city coffers, part of a 2004 bond package that also included the North Main Street streetscape project, according to David Bertnagel, the city’s chief accountant.
The only councilors to oppose the project, Democrat Kevin McCauley, said that because decision-makers “were erroneously informed at the City Council meeting that this allocation was from the state funds, I have asked the mayor and City Council to bring forth this issue at the next opportunity for reconsideration as we can discuss it openly again.”
Republican city Councilor Mike Rimcoski said he agreed on the need for a special meeting.
“I will come to it with my ax all sharpened, ready to cut off somebody’s head,” Rimcoski said Monday
“There are very few things I cannot tolerate,” Rimcoski said, and one of them “is being outright lied to.
He said that if officials were unsure of the answer, they should have said so rather than misleading the council, even if it wasn’t done deliberately.
Public Works Director Walter Veselka, who told councilors the money was coming from the state, said Monday that he thought it was.
“If I’m proved incorrect, then so be it,” Veselka said.
Several officials who tried to untangle the issue Monday said that money for downtown projects generally comes out of a pool of cash that once included $2 million from the state and $2.2 million from the city. Much of that has been spent already, though, and it can be unclear where any particular allocation originated.
It turned out, though, that the Center Street widening was specifically included in the 2004 bond package so it is entirely city money, not state cash.
Bertnagel said he can understand why officials got confused.
McCauley said “a better expenditure of city funds” would be to cover the cost of some major road projects that had been budgeted but got cut in the city’s rush to save money this year.
Bertnagel said, however, that the bond money can’t be shifted to some other use.
“We can’t just automatically use that money for another project,” Bertnagel said. He said if the city decided not to do the project, it would have to repay the bondholders, not shift the spending to another project.
Jonathan Rosenthal, the city’s economic development director, said the Center Street project was on the list created years ago for necessary downtown improvement.
He said it hasn’t been a priority recently, but does have the backing of the Bristol Development Authority.
Veselka said that when the design was first proposed, the idea was to add a right turn only lane for Center Street traffic turning onto North Main Street. But a traffic study found it would help more to make a left turn only lane instead.
That design was finished this year, Veselka said, and sent out for bids.
The council last week agreed to award the contract to the Vernon-based VMS Construction Co.

*******
Copyright 2009. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com

28 comments:

Anonymous said...

Bottom line Steve, the money can only be used for Center St.or returned, the next question to be asked should be is there a penalty for returning money you already bonded out?

Anonymous said...

Too little, too late, Mike. You own part of this blunder. Watch our for that axe.

Anonymous said...

Ward didn't even know or did he? Fine Mayor we have that he can't keep track of tax dollars or state money. Time for a change come election time.

Anonymous said...

At least somebody is paying attention. I guess "Dr. No" aka Councilman Rimcoski wasn't paying attention. He claims to be the fiscal watchdog, but instead he chose to slam McCauley for being cautious. Wrong move, Doctor.

Anonymous said...

Where was Cockayne?

Isn't he the BDA rep on the council?

Anonymous said...

WALTER NEEDS TO GO.

Anonymous said...

Politics as usual...let the games begin!

Anonymous said...

So quick to criticize, Rimcowski. I thought you liked maculey. I guess not, because then you wouldn't be making mean comments like you did.

Anonymous said...

It is clear that the council does not understand that some funding comes with restrictions. Actually, it is clear that the whole council, including the mayor are at a loss when it comes to city finances.

Maybe they should slow down and learn the job.

And the Republicans want to put up a neophyte?

Anonymous said...

glad councilman mccauley is on top of this and I think his idea of reevaluating all this projects as they go is a good one.

Anonymous said...

Whose project is it, Police, Public Works, BDA.

All have council members on their boards.

Anonymous said...

10:50 PM, You mean good job by McCauley's handler...

Anonymous said...

Now I feel better that the BDA put its stamp of approval on it, lmao.

No left turns? Im thinking this has to be part of the lower center st. by the FD? Or is it on the hill above D and D? Either way making a one turn only seems a bit weird to me.

Steve Collins said...

It's by the fire department, heading toward Federal Hill. The new lane would be for those turning left onto North Main. The other lane would be for right turns and those going straight.

Anonymous said...

...Bertnagel said, however, that the bond money can’t be shifted to some other use.
“We can’t just automatically use that money for another project,” Bertnagel said. He said if the city decided not to do the project, it would have to repay the bondholders, not shift the spending to another project"...

This comment by Bertnagel is sloppy and inaccurate. The central street project does not have to be done; the money can be used to fund something else, or simply not utilized until deemed necessary.

Why the rush to do this central street project; who benefits; why is the source funding a mysterious issue? You can't just chalk it up to mere incompetence. Something is fishy here.

Steve Collins said...

What rush? The project has been slowly moving along the process for years. It finally reached this point this year.

Anonymous said...

The BDA approved this knowing that the City would need to match this anyways? Thought the City was in financial trouble? Rosenthal doesn't mind wasting more of our money, he doesn't even live here. His best interest is not for the City, it is for whatever makes him look good and look like he's working

Anonymous said...

THEY SHOULD CHECK ALL OF WALTER PROJECTS IF YOU CAN`T TRUST HIM THE COUNCIL NEEDS TO GET RID OF HIM.

Odin said...

So why did Klocko sit there and let the Council vote on a $159,000 project with misinformation? Did he truly not know that it was Bristol taxpayers' dollars that was paying for this project, or was he trying to make McCauley look stupid? Either way, it backfired on him. I wouldn't want to be in his shoes at the next council meeting.

Steve Collins said...

Klocko didn't know. Heck, he didn't even know this past Monday morning. Nobody recognized where the money was coming from until Klocko asked Bertnagel to figure it out. Then we got the answer.
I'm not sure anyone's head needs to be lopped off, but I am sure it'll be an interesting meeting when this is taken up again.

he's good said...

make maccauley look stupid? he is good at doing that himself.

Anonymous said...

Mike,

I think that he public is ready to lop off some elected officials heads.

Anonymous said...

What is the job of the Controller?

Isn't he supposed to be on top of city finances?

Anonymous said...

NO CLUE THESE GUYS HAVE.

Anonymous said...

Didn't this have to go through P.Wks, or some other Boards?

Where was the Council then???

Anonymous said...

Why wasn't Klocko on top of this?

Was he working at his new job?

Anonymous said...

That's what happens when you hire people that don't even live in Bristol.(Klocko). They really don't care about the city, they just take a paycheck and go back to the town they live in.

Anonymous said...

HE`S HAS TO DO WARDS JOB TOO!!!