May 11, 2009

Larson, Murphy: Fix campaign fundraising

To combat the corrosive impact of money on politics, Connecticut’s congressional representatives said Monday they want to see public financing of federal campaigns.
“The current system is a built-in incumbent protection benefit,” said U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy, a Cheshire Democrat whose 5th District includes New Britain, Plainville and Plymouth.
One of the proposal’s champions – U.S. Rep. John Larson, an East Hartford Democrat whose 1st District includes Bristol – said the measure is so important that he hopes to push it through the House before it adjourns in August.
“We have a chance, a good chance, to fix the system this year,” said Bob Edgar, who heads Common Cause, a group that has long pushed for reform of a system it says gives too much power to wealthy donors and special interests.
The plan calls for congressional candidates to raise a large number of small campaign donations in order to qualify for federal funding that would bring them as much as the average national congressional campaign forked over.
Appearing with supporters at a press conference at the Legislative Office Building in Hartford, Larson said the money necessary to fund the plan could come from selling airwave rights, but he’s open to other ideas.
Larson, who has raised far more campaign cash than his challengers for years, said that Connecticut’s state campaign finance program can be “a model” for the nation.
“States have shown overwhelming success in reducing the influence of big donors” when they’ve adopted campaign finance, Larson said.
“Lawmakers are able to tend to the business of their constituents rather than spending their time dialing for dollars. It is time to bring real change to Washington,” Larson said.
With Larson’s leadership post as chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, Murphy said, he is optimistic that Congress can follow Connecticut’s lead in overhauling the way it runs campaigns.
The Fair Elections Now Act that all of Connecticut’s members of Congress have endorsed “would not only level the playing field for candidates of lower economic status; it would also limit the influence of large contributors, corporations, and special interest groups in elections, and help restore the integrity and transparency of the entire process,” Murphy said.
Murphy’s sole challenger, Republican Justin Bernier of Farmington, called on the Democratic incumbent to abide by its fund-raising terms immediately rather than waiting for legislation.
Murphy said he hadn’t seen Bernier’s letter, but had no intention of taking up the challenge.
Murphy said there is nothing wrong with playing by the existing rules while strongly urging their reform.
Larson said candidates can’t endanger their own reelection because the Democratic majority is required to have a shot at getting the badly needed reform.
Edgar said the public suffers from the existing system that depends on large donations from wealthy individuals and political action committees.
He pointed out that Wall Street “spent over a billion dollars” to dole out cash and pay lobbyists in the nation’s capital “and kept Congress and regulators at bay, until it was too late.”
Edgar said Congress needs to spend its time “working on solutions to the country’s problems,” not scurrying after donations for the next campaign.
For more information, please see

Copyright 2009. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at

1 comment:

Matt from Plymouth said...

Connecticut just implemented a taxpayer funded election system. I would be curious of the non-competitive seats from 1998-2006 were competitive for the 2008 election. I would hazard to guess that most if not all non-competitive seats prior to state financing were still non-competitive in 2008. ( See 78th district house and 8th district senate as an example) The money the State paid to finance those campaigns was a complete waste.

Let's not forget incumbents with plenty of money receive funding as well. Whether they need it or not. This law is not about need, it is about making it easier for incumbents to raise money without actually having to go and actually raise the money.

We live in the bizarro world. I'm now being asked to give 50 cents of every campaign dollar the government TAKES from me to go to a candidate I want to lose. Only a self-serving politician can believe such a system makes sense.