October 21, 2007

Route 72 ombudsman needed, Ward argues

With work getting underway on the $53 million Route 72 extension, the city needs to create an ombudsman for advisory panel to help residents who run into problems caused by the massive construction project, said Democratic mayoral candidate Art Ward.
Ward said that having someone, or a group of people, serve as “a conduit between the citizens and what was going on with the Route 72 project as it progresses” could help minimize problems for homeowners, businesses and others.
“It would give the populace one specific person or panel to address their concerns,” Ward said, and make it more likely that issues can be resolved quickly.
Back in the 1990s, the city appointed a volunteer ombudsman, Anthony Potocki, who helped residents deal with the state Department of Transportation when it was busy selling off surplus property that was no longer needed for the downscaled Route 72 that eventually won approval.
Ward said that Potocki proved a great help both for residents and city officials because he knew who to call and had many of the answers to questions readily available.
Being able “to focus the concerns into one venue,” Ward said, makes it simpler for everyone.
“Needless to say, that person would be accountable to the mayor and the City Council,” Ward said.
Ward said that the person or panel selected would ideally live near the project “and have a direct, hands-on approach” to resolving issues.
He said he envisions them getting to know the state officials and key construction personnel so they can go directly to the people with firsthand knowledge to answer queries or handle complaints.
Ward first made the suggestion last spring, but nothing happened in response. He said he is “not really surprised” that Mayor William Stortz didn’t follow up on the idea, adding that it’s only become crucial lately as construction gets underway.
A formal groundbreaking for the project occurred Monday, but contractors haven’t truly begun the massive job of putting in 2.4 miles of new road from the end of the expressway in Plainville to Route 229.
The road, which is expected to take 19 months to finish, will slice through a residential area in Forestville before crossing Yarde Pond, creating a boulevard-like section.
It will follow the same path as Pine Street starting at Todd Street, and then cut behind Dunkin’ Donuts across a new bridge over the Pequabuck River.
A pedestrian bride would be erected over the boulevard section of the road at Forest Street and a commuter lot would be relocated to Lake Avenue.

*******
Copyright 2007. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great Idea!

Anonymous said...

does anyone know where we can see a set of plans for this project?

Anonymous said...

This sounds like something Rosenthal came up with. I doubt Ward came up with this idea on his own. He knows what an Ombudsman is? Maybe a Bud Man, but not an Ombudsman.

Anonymous said...

Gee who's it going to be: Dave from Nuchies or Tony Savino? I can't wait!

Anonymous said...

It will be Tom Ragaini. His experience in the janitorial arts will come in handy to help people with transportation and construction issues.

Anonymous said...

didn't read where ward suggested anyone yet but what would be wrong with either of those choices or does it have to meet YOUR criteria which sounds like it centers around anything that is anti-ward. give it up and start thinking about what is good for bristol rather than exercising your feeble mindlessness.

Anonymous said...

Tony Savino is a great guy, honest, responsible and has tons of integrity. Ward cannot go wrong appointing him! Ward will choose the right person for the job, not the buddy as you all claim. He is not that way!

Anonymous said...

Maybe he'll appoint Morrie Laviero so he can scoff all the unused materials (like he took all the "sludge" on Pine Lake for free).

Anonymous said...

maybe his choice will be anonymous

Anonymous said...

I can't wait to see the pedestrian bride

Anonymous said...

I'm glad to see that Art is thinking about the citizens of Bristol and how this project is going to affect them. It's a great idea to have one "go to" person when it comes to the issues that this project will cause.

I'm sure whoever is appointed, that person will need to be approved by the entire city council, not just Art.

Anonymous said...

Thats what I 'm saying open gov't that a boy Artie you have my vote.

Anonymous said...

I do not believe that adding yet another person into the loops as an ombudsman is needed or warranted for the 72 construction.

Art Ward is completely off base in suggesting that we need an ombudsman for the 72 project.

It is a much better idea, that the elected officials (councilors) be the people tasked with dealing with concerns from the citizens in THEIR districts.

Isn't that why we have District Councilors Art? District Councilors are elected to represent and deal with the concerns of the citizens in their districts.

An "appointed" ombudsman has no responsibility to the Voters and Citizens of Bristol. They serve under the leadership of their anointer.

Removing elected councilors from the mix and "appointing" someone as Ombudsman just smells like Art is trying to start the a"ward"ing process to his followers.

Anonymous said...

boudreau, you need to get off your anti=ward gig and show us that you really can think objectively, you are so biased that it is sickening.

Anonymous said...

To Anonymous at 12:36a

When a voter challenges a Candidate for office on their platform or concepts for leading our City, why does that make them biased or unobjective?

Thoughtful posts / questions / statements are always appropriate for the Candidates that are running for office, especially when they are not made using the vail of the anonymity of the internet.

Hateful comments, heresay or gossip that is not able to be backed up by facts by "anonymous" posters on blogs show the real bias...

Anonymous said...

Isn't what Boudreau just said thinking objectively? He just made a very good comment. People don't want any favortism of any kind and having the mayor appoint an ombudsman makes the ombudsman accountable to the mayor thus the ombudsman does what the mayor wants or so it is perceived, even if there are good intentions behind the appointment. That would be with any mayor not just Mr. Ward whom I don't have a problem with. It leaves the perceived bad taste of impropriety out of the mix.

Anonymous said...

Art Ward is right on the money here. This is a huge project and having a designated "go to person" is a great idea. Way to go Art!

Anonymous said...

Thank God for Art Ward. He cares about us.

Anonymous said...

Unlike Johnson, who seems content with following in Stortz's footsteps and making the mayor's job all about himself.

Anonymous said...

we dont need a Ombudsman, what a waste of time,