April 8, 2008

Yarde urges creation of chief operating officer

Reporter Jackie Majerus wrote this story:
Mum City native Craig Yarde urged city councilors Tuesday to follow the lead of the Charter Revision Committee and create a city manager type position.
Bristol should have a chief operating officer, Yarde said, to ease the burden on the mayor and to make City Hall a more effective and efficient operation.
"It seems like there's already a vote cast against the city manager," said Yarde. "Everyone seems to be so deadlocked against it. I don't know why they're so threatened."
There aren't enough hours in the day for the mayor to handle all the minor issues that crop up during the day and do a good job of managing all the department heads, according to Yarde.
A chief operating officer, said Yarde, would "give the mayor more of an opportunity to be a visionary and get out of the weeds."
A professionally trained manager who knows the law is a "great resource," said Yarde, who will be worth more than the $130,000 salary he or she will earn.
In hiring a top-notch manager, said Yarde, the city will be "paid back in spades."
If the city followed Yarde's recommendation, the new manager would be making a larger salary than the mayor, but Yarde said that is okay;
"I think the mayor should be making what he is," said Yarde. "The city manager should make more."
Yarde addressed city councilors on Tuesday, when they accepted but did not yet act on the Charter Revision Commission's recommendations.
"I'm trying to raise awareness of the value of a COO," said Yarde.
He said there's so little oversight that the department heads end up doing as they see fit. Without regular evaluations, Yarde said, people don't know whether they're doing a good job or not and if not, what they need to do to make necessary changes.
"That isn't managing people, said Yarde. "They're like the Wild, Wild West out there."
Yarde said the city's mayors are not to fault for the situation.
"It's a fault of the city charter," said Yarde, because one person can't do everything.
People are a company's – or a city's – greatest asset, Yarde said, and they deserve to be treated with respect and decency.
If someone isn't doing a good job, said Yarde, the city would have a hard time getting rid of them because no one is keeping track of problems.
Yarde said the city's relationship with its economic development director, Jonathan Rosenthal, is "a perfect example" of how things can go awry.
When Mayor Art Ward's predecessor, Bill Stortz, was mayor, he refused to reappoint Rosenthal or fire him. The tension between Stortz and Rosenthal caused a problem in economic development, and Rosenthal lived in limbo for Stortz' entire term.
A good manager should be evaluating employees, Yarde said, but also motivating them and thanking them.
Rosenthal did a great job of working with his former company, Yarde Metals, as it grew in Bristol. He said Rosenthal tried hard to keep the company in town when it expanded, and said a lot of people in town – including some city officials – don't seem to know his loyalty to his hometown or how long he waited and worked to stay here before moving to Southington.
"Maybe they don't know the whole story," said Yarde, who has since sold the business but still lives in town.

*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com

59 comments:

Anonymous said...

A Town Manager, YES!

A COO, NO!

Anonymous said...

if it ain't broken, why break it?

Anonymous said...

If it means that City Hall will look at tacky as the entrance area to Yarde Metals, I would say NO.

Anonymous said...

This guy needs a new hobby.

Anonymous said...

Yarde ?????

Isn't that the guy that had the little old lady tossed out into the cold and then sold his business so he didn't want her land anymore ??

I think we should definitely follow his advice .

Bristol needs to get more ruthless if we expect the etchnic cleansing to proceed on schedule .

Horray for Bristol !!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Don't forget those Patriots tickets!

Anonymous said...

Here come the naysayers for the other side. Time to switch hats and start bashing away. So much for your positivity about moving Bristol forward.

What a bunch of BS! As long as it is your way, then it's great right?

Screw the unions! They are only holding us back!

Anonymous said...

no, screw you for calling critics "naysayers"! anyone who dares criticize your boy Ward is a naysayer I guess, so much for free speech.

Anonymous said...

I wonder why Yarde wants to spend more? How come these Bloggers aren't complaining about Yarde saying the town manager should make more? Maybe cause it's Bristol peoples tax money ? Not his !

Anonymous said...

..intelligence at it's best!

Anonymous said...

Looks like Craig Yarde is bored and is looking for another job.

Maybe City employees will get an onsite dog sitting area and a coffee shop.

Anonymous said...

..10:12 - bit paranoid aren't we sweetie? - you are really gonna go bonzai blaming ward if it rains on your parade, aren't you mommy's little clown?
love watching your blood vessels explode whenever the words - ward, ward, ward, ward, ward or ward are mentioned - you truly take on the appearance of a real dork.
You need to find a way to face reality and come to grips with the fact that it ain't gonna be your party, no matter how hard you cry, poopsie.

Anonymous said...

....10:12 Our "boy" Ward is doing a great job thanks. You're the one who seems to have the problem....

Why don't you put down that huge chip you're carrying around on your shoulder and take a nice stroll downtown. It's a beautiful day!

Anonymous said...

April 10, 2008 9:18 AM:

Right, and the city employees already have a "napping room". It's their work area.


April 10, 2008 12:49 PM:

You're a sick but laughable psycho-path. Next time I see Art Ward, I'll ask if he knows who you are, and if he can get you some mental counciling.

Anonymous said...

Naysayers are naysers.......if the shoe fits ....................

Anonymous said...

Yarde metals the CEO was Yarde . Isn't he the one that moved hs business to Southington cause they didn't throw the Bugryn family out fast enough for him ?

Anonymous said...

Yarde is a typical business that loves to spend taxpayers money. (other peoples money )

Anonymous said...

Maybe we ought to bring out Mr. Cleans (Yarde) background.

Anonymous said...

Union posters at work! they might accually have to answer to someone! Oh no!!! Arty will vote now on this. He owes them way too much!

Anonymous said...

....Hey 10:32 union hater guy, maybe you could hook up with that blight nazi guy, and the two of you could sit around discussing all of your latest paranoid delusions and conspiracy theories! Betcha that'd be fun, huh?

Anonymous said...

Steve, would you delete my last two posts and just post this one please? Thanks......

I'm a fiscal conservative and I hope Mayor Ward votes "NO" on this. I support him if he does vote "NO".

I can not be in favor of this unless there was a substantial decrease in the salary of the mayor (50% or so). Otherwise I can not see justification in doing this.

The salary of the mayor in the past has been increased to compensate for the extra responsibilities tied to the position. Mr. Yarde's argument has not been supported by any evidence such as detailed work loads and responsibilities of the two prospective postions. Does anyone really know what the mayor is supposedly so bogged down with?

Just say NO Mayor Ward, and I'll be with you.

Anonymous said...

grammatical error that is

Anonymous said...

poster 12:39

And that is why your a Former GOP Candidate!

Take a look at the last four mayors. None of them have the first clue as how to run a huge budget like we have!

Perhaps if you where in touch with what people want you might have won! Go sit and tell Arty what a good job he's doing!!

Anonymous said...

How come this current years budget is coming in right on target?

No overtaxing to produce a surplus, no large tax increase, adequate money for infrastructure.

Lets see how Ward does this time around.

Anonymous said...

Elcted officials increases have basically been tied to inflation increases.
I do not recall any jump due to change in job duties.

While they may or not be adequately compensated, they set the compensation

If there was to be a COO, taking on some of the current duties, certainly the mayor, and maybe the council shoould be taking a cut.

Anonymous said...

12:39 Neither can you run a budget at all hiding behind this blog . Go pound sand youmfake .....er Naysayer I mean !

Anonymous said...

April 11, 2008 2:48 PM:

The reason I am a former GOP Council candidate has nothing to do with this issue. You sir, are brainless and since that is not the issue here, I will stop there.

If you support a mayor making $100 thousand a year and a city manager making even more I question not only your common sense, but your adherence to the basic Republican principal of limited government.

You are a true RINO and that may be one of the reasons I am a "former" candidate. I'm not interested in supporting RINOs.

I stated "Mr. Yarde's argument has not been supported by any evidence such as detailed work loads and responsibilities of the two prospective postions. Does anyone really know what the mayor is supposedly so bogged down with?".

Instead of answering my questions you insult me. That is probably one of the reasons barely any Republicans get elected.

If you were a true Republican politician, instead of the hack you are, you would have also recognized this statement of mine and you should agree with it, "I can not be in favor of this unless there was a substantial decrease in the salary of the mayor (50% or so)".

Again if you don't I will not support you and I will encourage all (and I can) fiscally conservative Republicans to support Ward.

Anonymous said...

It seeme to me all the union boys are getting nervice the party will end with Yarde running the show.Dept heads will be let go replaced with real pros. HE WILL LET THE OLD DEPT HEADS CLEAN UP AFTER THE DOGS.

Anonymous said...

Yessir Yarde Is everything you cinics stand for . why not Make him a hero too ? Like the rest of you clowns.Maybe he can throw a few more families out so his business can move back to Bristol ......HA

Anonymous said...

Don't need a COO to replace Department heads.

Tell me, just what will be the role of mayor if this goes forward/

Sounds like that position would just be another council member at a lot more money.

Would Craig have sat still, letting someone else run his company?

Anonymous said...

MR YARDE DONT LET A FEW USELESS UNION GUYS DISCOURAGE YOU. THEY CANT BELEIVE SOME0NE FIGURED THEM OUT. ITS TIME TO SAVE BRISTOL AND YOU HAVE SUPPORT. WE NEED PEOPLE WHO COULD MANAGE PEOPLE.

Anonymous said...

MR YARDE PLEASE MAKE BRISTOL YOUR HOBBY AND SAVE US . TO MANY FAVORS OWED TO THE UNION . PUT A STOP TO THIS.

Anonymous said...

GO GET THEM MR YARDE YOU CAN DO IT WE NEED MORE PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND MR COCAYNE.

Anonymous said...

MR YARDE THEY DONT NEED A COFFEE SHOP THEY HAVE DUNKIN ACROSS THE STREET. WATCH HOW MANY TOWN WORKERS ARE INSIDE . ONE HOUR BREAKS WHILE THE MAYOR WATCHES THEM. HOW NICE IS THIS. WE NEED A MANAGER.

Anonymous said...

I WOULD NOT LET THE DEPT HEADS WATCH MY DOG THEY WOULD NOT FIGURE OUT WHAT TO DO.

Anonymous said...

Mike Petosa will try to get the dogs to join the union and promise them a stewart.

Anonymous said...

MAKING MORE WORK FOR THE UNION FOLKS.

Anonymous said...

12:51

We need a Mayor!!!

Anonymous said...

Craig Yarde does not have a clue as to how the city operates, and what the restrictions are.
But then, neither does Tim Furry

Anonymous said...

April 13, 2008 12:51 PM
&
April 13, 2008 8:08 PM

-Maybe you're both right, However is an appointed hack any better than an elected hack? We, the people, have the right to fire the mayor every two years if we feel he/she is not running the city correctly.
-Again I have not seen, heard or read any justification for creating a new, six figure position IN ADDITION to the mayor.

Anonymous said...

....HEY 12:39, 12:42,...

JUST BECAUSE YOU KNOW HOW TO USE THE CAP LOCK KEY DOESN'T MAKE YOU ANY SMARTER OR YOUR STATEMENTS ANYLESS DUMB....

....but you keep going with your one man campaign if you feel the need to do it. It's a free country....probably because the people we have ELECTED to represent us keep it that way....

Anonymous said...

If Mr. Yarde lets these Naysayers on here influence him he isn't worth much more thn they are. . Union haters and gloom and doomers.

Anonymous said...

April 15, 2008 5:28 AM
`````````````````````


definition of naysayer .....


anyone refusing to drink the kool-aid

Anonymous said...

April 15, 2008 5:28 AM:

Appearently the city manager will be a thorn in the side to the unions. So what do you mean? Also it's appearent you can't comprehend these subjects, so please go away.

Anonymous said...

....2:40 "Appearantly" you can't spell, never mind comprehend the concept of election and open government....

APPARENTLY, you're a thorn in the side of ....er.... everyone who has to listen to you, so please go away.

Anonymous said...

Naysayer, Naysayer, Naysayer.

Anonymous said...

First time to the Bristol Blog.
I wish everyone would use their real names rather than anonymous. I tried to post a comment a few days ago using my name Craig Yarde but it never went through. Maybe because I didn't know my URL, whatever that is. So I'll try anonymous and see if it makes it.
My main reason I like a city manager or COO is because I feel the last four Mayors who I know personally did not manage their twenty one direct reports. One Mayor told me he spent half his week hearing citizens complaints. We all know the ceremonial responsibilities and meetings the Mayor has to perform under the city charter. I would say a Mayor has a sixty hour plus week without ever managing his twenty one direct reports. Having running Yarde Metals for over 30 years, managing my direct reports was the hardest thing I had to do. It's a tough job to review everyone twice a year and have meetings with each one every few weeks to see how he/she is performing the goals and objectives
for each department. I had six associates reporting to me. I can't imagine what would happen if I had twenty one associates reporting to me and not meeting with them at all. Let me give you an example what happens when you don't manage your people. Under Mayor Stortz, it well documented in the Bristol Press about his issues with the BDA department head Jonathan Rosenthal.
There was also concerns about Jonathan's performance with the previous two administrations. Personally, I think he did a good job, but i was the customer not the boss. Well, Mayor Stortz bypassed the BDA and formed another committee to handle the mall project. Jonathan had already did the RFQ for the new mall project. Jonathan who makes about $100,000 per year job was in limbo for these two years as they bypassed him. The mayor asked me to be on this committee which I agreed until I found out he was bypassing the BDA. I respectfully told him I didn't agree with what he was doing and refused to be on the new mall committee. They have budgeted three hundred and fifty thousand dollars
for legal fees to set this committee up along with other expenses. Since the pass four mayors have not at all managed their twenty one direct reports their was nothing in Jonathans personnel file. No reviews, no verbal warnings, no written warnings, nothing at all. So there was no valid argument to dismiss him. Knowing the laws, I would guess it will cost the city anywhere from $500,000 to a million dollars to dismiss Jonathan Rosenthal. The main reason is he was managed so poorly. My question to fellow bloggers is what do you think the mayor should do at this
point to handle this individual. A very difficult situation. Can you see the legal difficulty by not managing you direct reports. There was a recent department head that sued the city for $250,000 dollars for the same reason. All I want is to protect the city and prevent our tax dollars from getting wasted for lack of management. We are talking some very serious money here that gets wasted. Your tax dollars.If know of any other areas were money has been squandered. Please email me at hirecoo@gmail.com Thank you

Anonymous said...

April 15, 2008 3:52 PM

Apparently you corrected my spelling error, thanks. But apparently you are too think headed and ignorant to understand the flow of the conversation

I proudly say "NAY" as of now to a city manager. Evidently the "anti-naysayer" is a union hack. Again, apparently the union hacks are against the city manager idea as well. So I'm with the "anti-naysayer, pro-Ward person, but the idiot still calls me a "naysayer". You can't win an argument against silly blow-hards.

Anonymous said...

Craig Yarde, who certainly had a successful stint as a businessman, clearly is out of touch with reality as far as municipal operations go..

If each of the past 4 mayors did not manage, then how come we have done as much as we have?

If Craig wants to resolve the Mall without public input and feedback, as Jonathan was doing, and drag it out as Jonathan is doing with SEBBP, and mishandling it as was done the streetscape, then so be it.

But he clearly does not know the procedures that exist, and would exist, even if we had a Town Manager, which is different from a COO.

It isn't just a Union issue, but a combination, and they exist in all towns to various degrees.

Unless you saw the personnel files, I do not know how you can say that some things were not documented.

Were there any repremands, warnings etc.

Were there situations where people like you knew that the department head would probably outlast the mayor so you didn't come forward for the record?

Craig, walk a mile in mayors shoes before you criticize.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Yarde, in your list of four are you including Ward or Leone?

Anonymous said...

Bill,
I agree.

Anonymous said...

No, I did not include Leone in my remarks and by the way he is a strong supporter of the Charter Revision Committee to create a COO position. I know Artie has recently put some warnings in Jonathan's file but the horse is out of the barn. Because Frank, Couture and Bill has never given any reviews, no verbal and no written warnings and have given very little direction to department heads, the stage is already set. I have heard rumors of antisemitic remarks and one mayor grabbing Jonathan's ass but it's only hearsay at this stage. It will all come out in the wash when Bristol decides to do something with his employment. What we have here is lifetime employment in the city unless we decide to pay him to leave and that will be big bucks. I didn't say anything about public impute to the mall or nothing being accomplished. What I'm saying is we are not managing the people side of the city business which will get the city in big law suits in the future unless we let everyone have lifetime employment. Is that what we want?
Craig Yarde

Anonymous said...

Looks like Yard is a Johnny Come Lately, with all the solutions.

He was busy making money for himself while others were trying to create a better Bristol.

Now that he has nothing else to do, he is "getting" involved.

Gimme a break!

Anonymous said...

Again, Craig clearly show his lack of awareness as to how municipalities operate, Bristol being very similar to all others in Conn.

I suggest he do some research and stop embarassing himself.

He is just like most politicians, pandering to a select few.

Only he claims to be "holier than thou".

Anonymous said...

To 3:52 pm I don't call people names and I don't know what a Union Hack is but your hatred for Unions are showing. You sir a hate monger and a "Political Hack" for tje republican party! Go find something to do . Your childness is showing !

Anonymous said...

Now that Yarde is done leaving Bristol because they didn't throw out a family fast enoughhe wantsto run Bristol. Why not trying to run Southington Mr. Yarde? They have what you want a 'Town Manager" Or are you looking for a job so you can bleed Bristol some more.

Anonymous said...

April 17, 2008 3:48 PM

A "hack" is a partisan, sometimes unscrupulous activist for a certain political organization or movement.

The "hack" in question is certainly that, while also making defamatory, insulting, rude, base-less statements.

I'm not sure you even are aware of the conversation flow or whom you're referring to or respoding to, so I would suggest that you sir need to go find something else to do.

If being a supporter of smaller, less intrusive, less costly government makes me a supporter of the Republican Party, so be it. I find that a cause worth "hack-ing" for.

Anonymous said...

Who are you then?

Anonymous said...

I'm showing you what you are......nothing !!