April 2, 2008

Schools saved $1.8 million through energy conservation over past decade

During the past decade, an energy savings program adopted by the Board of Education has saved more than $1.8 million, officials said Wednesday.
The energy program has reduced the expected outlay for utilities through a wide range of conservation measures, some as simple as turning off the lights at the end of the day.
“We’ve been helping Al Gore in his quest to make this a green world,” said William Smyth, the assistant superintendent for business.
Smyth said that by slicing the use of electricity, natural gas and heating oil, the city’s schools have reduced energy use as much as getting 4,614 cars off the road or planting almost 10,000 acres of forest.
But the quest to save energy is far from over.
Smyth told the Board of Education Wednesday that the two new schools eyed for Bristol will be designed with energy efficiency in mind.
He said they are likely to have passive solar panels on the roof and “green design” ideas incorporated throughout the 900-student structures.
Almost a third of the energy savings occurred in just one school, Bristol Central High School.
Smyth said its design proved the most conducive to reducing the use of electricity and heating oil.
For example, even though it has about the same number of students as Bristol Eastern High School, it costs $337 a day for electricity at Central and $407 a day at Eastern.
The cheapest daily use is at Chippens Hill Middle School, the newest building, where the tab is $266 a day for electricity.
Stafford Elementary also saw a large reduction in its expected use, probably because it was so inefficient to begin with. Smyth said that officials have made changes that included changing steam traps there.
The city hired a half-time energy consultant to lend a hand with its efforts to pare utility bills back in 1997. The effort hasn’t waned as prices soared.
Smyth said the savings would be even higher except that the school system gets comparatively cheap natural gas and electricity through consortiums to which it belongs.
Reducing energy use, Smyth said, is basically a cost avoidance program.
Replacing four older schools with two new ones as soon as 2011 will further cut energy use since the new buildings will be more efficient than Memorial Boulevard Middle School and three aging elementary schools targeted for closure, officials said.
The only building in the school system that has seen its energy costs rise is the central administrative office.
Smyth said that it has much more use these days, because there are more administrators and because of the many professional development programs conducted there.

*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good going Scotty: we will miss you!

Anonymous said...

If they want to save more money they should turn the heat down slightly. Many kids wear short sleaves or shorts all year because the schools are too hot. Often the heat is on and the windows are open. I know schools need fresh air but maybe they could do it at the end of each day if the heat is turned off or down for a short while.

Anonymous said...

Hey , if it takes an idiotic fantasy like al gore hallucinated to get the schools to save the taxpayers some money , I say go on al , keep dreaming up even more bizarre crapola .

Anonymous said...

WE COULD SAVE MORE MONEY GET RID OF SOME PRINCIPLES AND OTHERS THAT CANT CARRY THERE WEIGHT.

Anonymous said...

Hey Mr. 5:49: if you're a product of the Bristol school system, then you would appear to be Exhibit A as to why more money, not less, should be spent on public education in this city. It's "principals", not "principles"; and "their", not "there". Nice try, though.

Anonymous said...

April 3, 2008 5:49 PM:

YOU'RE 100% CORRECT (sans the spelling)!

The priciple should be to get rid of excess Vice Principals.

Anonymous said...

Hey ..... leave the principals / vice-principals alone ....

We need somewhere to put our totally useless teachers to keep our union membership content .

Anonymous said...

2;43 - you can read...who taught you? One of those totally useless teachers perhaps?

Anonymous said...

April 4, 2008 6:37 PM


They take the most useless 'teachers' and move them to administrative positions .

The few that are capable of making a positive impact are left in the trenches so that some actual learning will occur .

I hope this helps you to understand the bristol education system .

Anonymous said...

April 5, 2008 11:04 AM

LOL, you have me believing!

Anonymous said...

The savings will be eaten up by pay raises.

Anonymous said...

They should compensate the administrators for their travel costs and gas mileage to get back and forth from their out of town homes.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Streiffer moved TO Bristol when he was appointed. He didn't have to.

How come that is never mentioned???

Anonymous said...

Isn't the superindentent REQUIRED to live to Bristol? None of the other administrators are required, and a lot of them don't live here. Just like the City department heads.

Anonymous said...

Did Wasta live in Bristol???
Does Klocko live in Bristol???
Does Rosenthal live in Bristol???
Does Weiner live in Bristol???

Anonymous said...

And Bristol would be a lot better off with these Whining naysayers leaveing Bristol. I wish someone on here could tell me what these whiners are good for ?

Anonymous said...

Definition of Naysayer:

One who doesn't agree with me.

Anonymous said...

To 6:54 You got it !!! You naysayers don't agree with any body but your own !!

Anonymous said...

another definition of naysayer ...

anyone refusing to drink the kool-aid .