February 8, 2008

Closing in on the "tipping point"

Poverty rates are soaring in Bristol.
In just the past four months, 5 percent more elementary school children in Bristol have successfully applied for free or reduced-price school lunches because their families don't have much money.
Susan Moreau, the assistant school superintendent, said that applications are coming in daily. Many of them are the result, she said, of mothers or fathers getting laid off in the slowing economy.
In all, officials said, 37 percent of the city's elementary school students are getting discounted or free lunches.
To Tom O'Brien, a Board of Education member, the numbers are alarming.
O'Brien said that studies show that once the poverty rate hits 40 percent in a community, it's almost impossible to slow the slide. He said that "it almost always jumps to 60 percent within five or six years" after reaching that tippoing point, the result of the spiraling impact of rising taxes to cope with the cost and a middle class fleeing for greener pastures.
The community should be "very, very concerned" that poverty keeps going up, O'Brien said. "This is a very scary thing," he said.
Unless city leaders find a way to attack blighted housing and crack the whip on out-of-town landlords and slumlords, O'Brien said the trend is clear.
Without a change, he said, "We will be New Britain. We will be Meriden. We will be East Hartford."
"The city cannot just sit here and hope it goes away," O'Brien said.
School Superintendent Philip Streifer said that rising numbers of poor children make it tough on educators, too.
He said he was shocked to see how many of the incoming kindergarten students in Bristol last fall didn’t know the kinds of basic facts, from colors to letters, that they should have learned beforehand.
“These kids are unprepared to learn,” he said, adding that perhaps a third of the incoming youngsters didn’t have the backgrounds they should.
Starting off “so far behind” their peers in more affluent communities and families, it’s tough for them to catch up, officials said.
He said that poverty is also the main reason that 40 percent of the students in an average elementary school class in Bristol move during each school year, half of them out of the town and half to another school district.
That puts a burden on both teachers and students because of the loss of continuity.

*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

"The community should be "very, very concerned" that poverty keeps going up, O'Brien said. "This is a very scary thing," he said.
Unless city leaders find a way to attack blighted housing and crack the whip on out-of-town landlords and slumlords, O'Brien said the trend is clear."

So put the proposed West end school in the West End and get rid of the blighted slum lord properties!

Anonymous said...

Tom O'Brien is correct. Cracking down on the slum-lords is part of the answer. But who else is buying old, multi-family houses that no one else wants?

Steve Collins said...

O'Brien pushed pretty hard for putting the school on the Park and Divinity street site. He didn't win that battle -- at least not yet. And I'm not sure he's trying anymore.

Anonymous said...

Proverty is going up why build a $115 million dollar school? Who will pay for that - certainly not those in proverty!

Steve Collins said...

The problem with dealing with a rising poverty rate is that it may take some big spending to reverse the trend. I'm not saying that new school buildings are the answer, but I am sure that a community that doesn't shell out some money to do something different than it has been doing is going to have a hard time changing a bad trend.
The path that the city is on doesn't look too promising.
Fortunately, there are quite a few promising developments, from Route 72 to the possibility of remaking the mall property, that offer hope for a new direction.

Anonymous said...

Personally I would like to "Thank" Frank Nicastro for starting this trend.

His "don't spend/invest" was a big factor.

Granted, we have the buidings that provide space, but there was vast indifference to enforcing anything under his administration.

It will not change overnight: the first thing is to have the people admit that it exists, is real.

Maybe O'Brien's "tear them all down is severe", but something does have to be done!!!



A sgood people leave, the open spaces are filled by owners with anyone that pays the rent, especially Section 8.

Are you paying attention Gary?

Anonymous said...

There is nothing that says and prevents us from going ahead and putting the school on the Scalia site AND also addressing the Park Street and Federal Hill area.

This would allow the best solution in both areas, and the cost difference would appear to be the one million that we would be spending for the Scalia site.

At the same time, we could move quickly and provide better education opportunities sooner.

Anonymous said...

Moreau should take a hefty pay cut , Tom Obrien been doing her job for years,Steve what is her job description????? .I do appreciate the effort that obrien puts into the B.O.E.

Anonymous said...

"There is nothing that says and prevents us from going ahead and putting the school on the Scalia site AND also addressing the Park Street and Federal Hill area."

However, experience tells us that nothing ever comes together that neatly. The Park and Divinity location offered additional, long-term benefits that can not be realized at alternate sites.

Anonymous said...

"The problem with dealing with a rising poverty rate is that it may take some big spending to reverse the trend"

More liberal-speak from our overt liberal Steve Collins. They spent millions on the "Egg" and a museum in Albany, NY and it did nothing to change Albany from being mostly a black slum.

Steve Collins said...

I'm actually pretty damn conservative when it comes to spending money, for what it's worth.

Anonymous said...

6:26

The people most closely involved have said more than one, that they would like toutilize the Scalia site.
I am of the opinion is that they were putting educational issues art the top of their priority list, whisch is as it should be.

Delays will cost money, operating costs will probably be higher, and Education will become the scapegoat again.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like it's time for the Bristol Gestapo to kick it up a notch and throw more people out into the cold and tear down a whole bunch more buildings .

That will sure fix those nasty unwashed Bristolites so love to hate .