February 2, 2008

City Hall may be doomed

City Hall could be on its deathbed.
Though officials haven’t said much in public for a few years, there’s a growing awareness that the city’s main office building needs a costly overhaul – or perhaps, some day, it ought to be replaced entirely.
City Councilor Craig Minor highlighted the concern recently when he mentioned during a Building Committee session that he wants the city to spend as little as possible on renovations to the building.
“Especially if we don’t keep this building more than another 10 years or so,” Minor said, it doesn’t make sense to pour money into upgrades.
“The quick and simple solution” to immediate needs in the building is best, Minor said.
“I think cost is what should control it,” said City Councilor Mike Rimcoski, who also urged officials to spend as little as they can on the building.
Though there aren’t any plans on the table, one obvious option is to have city government move into Memorial Boulevard Middle School if education officials follow through on a scheme to shut down the school.
Officials have said that a study to determine the needs at City Hall would cost about $78,000.
There are millions of dollars worth of renovations and updates needed within the building, they said, and it may be cheaper in the long run to erect a new City Hall rather than tackling the issues piecemeal.
“We need to get a plan about what’s going to happen in general,” said George Wallace, assistant public works director.
On the table at the moment is how to provide more space for the city’s probate court and corporation counsel’s offices.
It appears that the cheapest option is to have the city’s purchasing office move into the former youth services space on the second floor so that the two third floor offices can carve up the purchasing office for their own needs.
Wallace said the current setup includes “an inefficient use of space” and the change ought to provide the court and lawyers the additional room that they need.
The purchasing office would wind up with even more space than it has now, officials said.
The shift would not cost much, officials said, and would resolve the immediate problem.
Wallace said that public works estimates a building study would cost $78,000 but it could perhaps be combined with a $50,000 study of police space needs that’s also in the works. That might make the overall total less.
A number of officials, including Mayor Art Ward, have said they don’t want to repeat the decision they made a decade ago to pour $4 million in police renovations that are no longer adequate to the department’s needs.
A new building may make more sense financially than trying to overhaul the 45-year-old office building on North Main Street, particularly with the mall property across the street offering the potential of more lucrative commercial uses for the building or its site.

*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

The current City Hall structure and Police Court complex, is a classic example of fiscal restraint (build only what you need today and don't worry about tomorrow). The City Father's have always made decisions based on "Let's not waste the taxpayers dollars". They never look far enough ahead into the future. The correct solution in this situation is to build a new City Hall combined with Police and Fire Headquarters. Although initially the project would seem to be cost prohibative, having one very large structure would make for a more efficient use of land in the downtown area. The overall expense to run the three sections of government in one building would be considerably less.

Anonymous said...

An issue of a blighted City Hall in the proposed pedestrian friendly downtown developement site ?!?!?!

Gee .... I hope it doesn't get torn down over some weekend and the mayor and his ilk need somewhere to go when they return on a monday . :-)

Anonymous said...

this is great news, it is another idea or project that will go nowhere. Finish one thing at a time. Mayor Ward sure has lost his chain of thought. A little uppitey Art. Get everyones act together. Time passing YOU by.

Anonymous said...

...City officials discussing the fact that city hall is old and needs renovation or replacement can hardly be described as being "uppity." The fact that the mayor and city officials are taking the time to discuss different options or in your words, "get eveyone's act together" proves that the mayor has a firm grasp on his chain of thought...however, I do have serious doubts about yours...

Anonymous said...

a move to Memorial Blvd school would be disasterous...it was a stupid stortz plan

Anonymous said...

"The current City Hall structure and Police Court complex, is a classic example of fiscal restraint"

February 2, 2008 9:46 AM: Then you must be a classic "tax and spend liberal". What are you basing this stupid comment of yours on?

Anonymous said...

I don't believe that Stortz said that City Hall would or should move to the Boulevard.
As you recall, he mentioned many possible things that would affect the overall development of the Downtown area, and that they should be considered.
City Hall to the Boulevard was one of them, just as moving City Hall to upper main street might be considered, as well a moving Engine #1 to Chic Miller site etc. etc.

He just pointed out the options, just as some of them, as well as others, are being considered now.

ALL Ideas should be on the table.

Anonymous said...

Let's move all municipal buildings off North Main Street . Someone removed four travel lanes and now we can't get in or out .


Damn gremlins

Anonymous said...

Talk about wasting tax dollars, lets invest 4 million dollars on a police department just to move the rooms around and add one or two new small rooms. What a waste of money that was. We who work inside the police department knew that but Frank Nicastro and his crew weren't listening. They just didn't want to spend the money to do the job the right way.

Lets hope that this new administration doesn't make the same mistake.

Anonymous said...

12:20 try rereading the first post .I believe it is clearly explained

Anonymous said...

February 4, 2008 2:54 PM:

Exactly my sentiments. Neither the city gov't nor the buffoons running it have any idea about private enterprise.

The four to two lane idea has proven to be a total waste of tax money as well as the side walk improvements.

Odin said...

What does "private enterprise" have to do with running a city?

Anonymous said...

**************
The four to two lane idea has proven to be a total waste of tax money as well as the side walk improvements.

**************
Actually ..... it was EIGHT lanes down to TWO.

Four lanes in each direction down to one lane in each direction .

worse than you thought ? ;-)

Anonymous said...

**************
Odin said...
What does "private enterprise" have to do with running a city?

February 4, 2008 11:20 PM

******************
When the city buys commercial property ( mall site etc... ) as an investment , I think they have crossed the line into private enterprise .

Anonymous said...

OOPS, I have to get my glasses adjusted. I thougtt it said that city hall may be "domed".

Anonymous said...

I think that the headline should read;

"City Hall dooms Bristol".