Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
October 3, 2008
Larson coming to Bristol Monday to try to give people money
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
October 2, 2008
West Bristol school site likely to win council backing
Mayor Art Ward said he'll vote for the new site and at least two of the Scalia site backers, Kevin McCauley and Craig Minor, said they will as well. Cliff Block and Ken Cockayne arevirtually certain to go along.
While it's less clear what Frank Nicastro and Mike Rimcoski, two Scalia site critics, will do, their opposition wouldn't matter. The vote is almost certain to be 5-2 for the new site picked by the West Bristol School Committee this week.
Ward said there won't be a special City Council session on the issue. It will come up instead at the October council meeting, where councilors will ask the Planng Commission for its recommendation.
That won't come until later in October, but this time it probably wouldn't matter if the panel said no again since there is likely to be at least a two-thirds majority among councilors.
The council meeting in November is slated for Nov. 12, a Wednesday, because of the Veterans Day holiday.
The only hitch? That it's also the night of a so long celebration for outgoing Bristol Chamber of Commerce President John Leone, which the council wants to attend.
A $130 million plan to build two new schools that looked battered and perhaps beaten a week ago now appears likely to win final approval with little trouble.
City councilors are poised to back the proposed West Bristol school site off Matthews Street.
“It looks like it would work and it would be feasible,” city Councilor Kevin McCauley said.
With Mayor Art Ward’s backing, the site near the corner of Clark Avenue and Matthews Street appears likely to garner the support of at least five of the seven City Council votes, enough to assure its passage even if the Planning Commission gives it a thumbs-down.
McCauley said he’s glad “more of us are on the same page” for the proposed site.
The last parcel recommended by the West Bristol School Building Committee – a sandpit off Barlow Street – was gunned down by planners.
Though the planning panel doesn’t have the last word, any project that it doesn’t support cannot pass muster unless there’s a two-thirds vote by the council. That provision was enough to kill the Scalia pit site because the council’s support fell short of the required margin in the wake of the planners’ choice.
That left school backs scrambling for an alternate site to go along with the one on the former Crowley auto dealership property on Pine Street.
City Councilor Craig Minor said that he’ll “go along” with the new site recommendation for the west side of town even though it’s even further from the West End, where many of the children who would go to the 900-student school live.
“We’re not going to get it in the West End,” Minor said.
Ward said the new site offers better accessibility and infrastructure than the Scalia location did.
Plus, he said, “at least this is flat.”
Minor said that his support for the new site is contingent on school officials finding a way to preserve an 18th century house that sits beside the Clark Avenue and Matthews Street junction.
“We need to save that house,” Minor said.
It appears that two other councilors, Ken Cockayne and Cliff Block, will also support the new location for the proposed school, which would lock in five votes in its favor.
The other two council members, Frank Nicastro and Mike Rimcoski, opposed the Scalia site and may not be satisfied with the new one either. Their backing isn’t necessary, however.
It’s likely the council will the site at its November meeting.
Ward said there won't be a special City Council session on the issue, as some had said. The issue will come up instead at the October 14 council meeting, where councilors will ask planning for its formal recommendation.
That won't come until later in October, leaving the council’s November 12 meeting as the most likely time for councilors to endorse the location.
There is at least one potential hitch that could still derail the $130 plan to build two new schools for kindergarten to eighth grade.
Some critics are weighing the possibility of forcing a public referendum on the plan, a move that would require gathering more than 3,000 signatures from city voters. If they try – and get the signatures – then the electorate would have the last word.
The overall plan calls for construction to start in June 2010 and the doors of the new schools to open as soon as 2012. When they do, the Board of Education will shut down three aging elementary schools and historic Memorial Boulevard Middle School, which once served as the city’s sole high school.
*******
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
Biden and Palin face off tonight
*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
Voter rolls highest in years
The latest tally shows 32,691 registered voters in the city – 187 more than were on the rolls during the last presidential election year.
Republican Registrar Ellie Klapatch said the numbers are "going to be higher" by the time the voter rolls are closed on October 28.
Already, there are more registered voters in Bristol than the city has had in at least 15 years.
Democrats hold the loyalty of a slight plurality of the voters in town, outnumbering independents by a tiny margin.
During the 2004 presidential contest and for a couple of years after that, unaffiliated voters totaled more than either party in Bristol, but the hot Democratic U.S. Senate primary and a dissatisfaction with President George W. Bush caused the number of Democrats to rise again, officials said.
For generations before 2004, the Democrats held sway in Bristol, but a trend toward more independents has slowly eroded the party's advantage.
Currently, Democrats claim the allegiance of 13,652 voters in Bristol while Republicans trail with 5,454.The number of unaffiliated voters stands at 13,542, just a tad shy of the Democratic tally.There are 43 people who signed on with a minor party.That means Democrats hold 41.7 percent of the voters, while independents make up 41.4 percent.
Republicans trail badly, with 16.7 percent of the electorate declaring allegiance to the GOP side.
But the Republicans have captured 15 to 20 percent of the voters for many years. Their numbers have slipped only a little over the past two decades.
Democrats, on the other hand, used to have a commanding hold on the electorate.
In 1984, for example, 49 percent of city voters called themselves Democrats and only 32 percent were unaffiliated.
Still, the last presidential contest saw just 39.5 percent of the city's electorate registering as Democrats so the gain during the past four years is substantial.
In 2004, 43.1 percent of voters were independents, a number that has gone down as much as the Democratic tally has risen.
The overall number of registered voters in 2004 was 31,777. In 2000, it was 31,062. In 1996, there were 31,580 voters.
But the city has seen larger numbers in the past. In 1982, for example, the number of voters was 34,570.
The deadline for in-person registration this year is October 28, though there's no reason to wait that long. The registrars have an office on the first floor of City Hall. Mail-in forms have to be postmarked by October 21.
Absentee ballot will be available starting next week.
The election is on Tuesday, November 4.
Precinct facts
Most voters – District 78A (4,135)
Most Democratic – District 77A (44.3 percent)
Most Republican – District 78A (19.7 percent)
Least Democratic – District 22 ((38.7 percent)
Least Republican – District 79C (15.7 percent)
Total number of precincts - 10
*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
Personnel Appeals Board to get the boot
The Personnel Appeals Board is likely to be abolished, but it’s doubtful anyone will notice.
The panel hasn’t met in at least 12 years, said city Councilor Frank Nicastro, a former mayor who chairs the city’s Salary Committee.
Officials are looking into the technicalities of dumping the board and letting the Salary Committee pick up the slack, such as it is.
Personnel Director Diane Ferguson said that axing the board would allow non-bargaining unit employees who want to appeal a firing or suspension to make a case to the Salary Committee.
She said it makes more sense for the appeals to go to a committee that at least meets regularly and knows how the personnel system operates rather than pleading to a panel that hasn’t met within memory.
It tried one time some years ago, Ferguson and Richard Lacey, a city lawyer, recalled. But the board couldn’t get a quorum so it gave up trying.
Nicastro said the proposal to dump the board “has a lot of merit” and deserves serious consideration.
One point that arose when the Salary Committee discussed the issue recently is that department heads are covered by a union contract that lays out who has the power to order them to do anything.
They would appeal grievances and punishments through their union, Ferguson said.
Several officials pointed out there is no role for the proposed chief operating officer in the union contracts, leaving it unclear how someone in the new job would have any clout over the municipal supervisors he’s supposed to oversee day to day.
“How’s the COO going to be able to do his job?” asked city Councilor Cliff Block, who opposes the position’s creation.
Nobody offered an answer.
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
October 1, 2008
Matthews Street parcel wins support as new school site
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
Presidential polling trends
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
Latest voter registration numbers in Bristol
The latest tally shows 32,691 registered voters in town.
Democrats claim the allegiance of 13,652 while Republicans trail with 5,454.
The number of unaffiliated voters stands at 13,542, just a tad shy of the Democratic tally.
There are 43 people who signed on with a minor party.
Republican Registrar Ellie Klapatch said the numbers are "going to be higher" by the time the voter rolls are closed.
Though I suspect few of this blog's readers are not registered, if anybody's interested, the deadline for in-person registration is October 28, though there's no reason to wait that long.
Mail-in forms have to be postmarked by October 21.
And let me add that failing to pick a party when you register is pointless. If you sign on with a party, you can vote in primaries for that party. If you remain unaffiliated, you simply leave it entirely to the political parties to pick the candidates for you.
Since the primaries are often the most interesting matchups, why would you pass up the chance to participate in them?
It's fine to be independent-minded and vote for the candidate, not the party. I certainly vote for hopefuls from both sides of the aisle. But that's not a reason to steer clear of picking a party. The only reason to do that is if you trust the Republicans, Democrats, Greens and such to select the candidates for you.
*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
Flying pumpkins on Chippens Hill
In less than a month, pumpkins will be hurled through the sky for hundreds of feet by contraptions that medieval armies might have used to turn fortresses into rubble.
Bristol’s second annual Pumpkin Chuckin’ contest, to be held at Roberts Orchard, will feature 5-pound pumpkins launched with a variety of catapults, slingshots and other devices to determine who can fling one the furthest.
“It’s just purely for fun,” said Jessica Dumont, the event’s organizer.
The winner, she said, is “the King Chucker, the Grand Poobah of Pumpkin Chuckin’.”
The pumpkin chuckin’ contest is part of the two-day Pumpkin Festival, which begins on Saturday, October 25.
The first day’s events, sponsored by the city and the Imagine Nation museum, will take place at the former downtown mall site.
They’ll include a costume parade, pumpkin seed spitting and the evening’s illumination of the carved pumpkins that people drop off.
“Some of them” last year “were so ornate it was unbelievable,” said Susan Roesch, a Federal Hill resident.
The following day’s pumpkin chuckin’ lasts from noon until 2 p.m. in the large field behind the Roberts Orchard store on Hill Street.
Dumont said that seven teams participated in last year’s pumpkin chuckin’, including people who brought their pumpkin hurling machines from as far as Boston and New Jersey.
“These men had huge machines,” she said, that could fling pumpkins the length of a football field or beyond.
Dumont said that last year’s competition was “really exciting” and interesting.
Anyone interested in constructing a device to throw pumpkins should get cracking, Dumont said, because it takes awhile.
She said there will be adult and youth divisions, but there are no prizes for winners beyond the glory of success.
For more information on the festival, check out its website here.
Check out the Waterbury Republican-American's slideshow of last year's event by clicking here.
*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
Green Party contender blasts Larson for bailout vote
Green Candidate for Congress Stephen Fournier today criticized his opponent, Democratic incumbent John Larson, for the congressman's vote in favor of the Wall Street bailout.
"My question for John Larson," said Fournier, "is which faction of the Democratic caucus--the 140 in favor or the 95 against--abandoned principle to cast this vote? This bailout is a patchwork of political deals and does nothing to address the corruption of the financial system. Voters oppose it overwhelmingly as too radical, too expensive, and un-American. It amounts to the payment of blackmail to crooked bankers, who threaten to cancel further credit if they don't get this money. Credit markets have been stressed for over a year, while Democrats and Republicans sat on their hands. Now, suddenly, it's an emergency requiring an unprecedented transfer of wealth from ordinary people to the rich anti-citizens who finance these same Democrats and Republicans. They inflated the economic bubble, cashing in at every expansion, and now Larson wants to compensate them because it popped."
*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
State retirement panel takes taxpayers for a ride
At some point, tthe commission held meetings in Hartford in the morning and again in the afternoon on the same day. Its members, collectively, get $2,900 in per diem to pay for their time and travel.
What pushed this one over the edge is that the commissioners agreed to give themselves a per diem payment for the morning session and then an entirely separate per diem for the afternoon.
So instead of costing the state $2,900, the day socked state funds for $5,800.
That's so brazen that it raises all sorts of questions about the attitude of the commission toward the money they're supposed to preserve and enhance.
Some of the shenanigans the auditors found with the panel's air travel only make the situation seem more dire for taxpayers.
Here's one section of the long report that bears scrutiny:
The chairman and the actuarial trustees of the Retirement Commission have billed the State Employees’ Retirement Fund with two per diem payments for the same day, as well as air travel and hotel costs in excess of what is customary and reasonable for travel on State business.
Some excessive charges noted by our audit were:
• The payment of two separate per diem payments of $2,900 each, applicable to morning and afternoon Retirement Commission meetings held on the same day.
• The payment of $944 for round trip airfare that customarily costs $350 to $400 for State employees.
• The payment for two round-trip airfares to attend a single meeting, one to cover the travel from Orlando, Florida to the member’s hometown area in New Jersey, then a second from New Jersey to Connecticut to attend the Commission’s meeting. The total cost of airfare was $1,043. In addition, reimbursement was made for $284 for the cost for a single night of airport lodging prior to the trustee’s departure from New Jersey to Connecticut.
• Incurring of $2,198 in travel-related costs relative to two special meetings, each of which lasted less than two hours in duration, rather than choosing to attend via teleconference.
Total per diem and travel costs paid from the State Employees’ Retirement Fund, which was approved by the Commission, totaled $229,187 for the 2006-2007 fiscal year.
Effect: The State Employees’ Retirement Fund is charged with administrative costs in excess of what is generally considered reasonable for governmental service.
Cause: State travel regulations controlling travel expenditures were not made applicable to the Retirement Commission. The definition of "normal and usual per diem fee, plus travel expenses" was never established at the time the chairman and actuarial trustees were originally appointed. The Commission as a body approves the per diem and travel expenditures of its own members. The Commission does not routinely employ teleconferencing as a method to save the time and travel costs of Commission members.
Recommendation: The Connecticut State Employees Retirement Commission should adopt, or otherwise implement, regulations to effect the limitation of costs related to trustees’ overnight lodging and travel that are commensurate with the reimbursement amounts set forth in the State Travel Regulations. (See Recommendation 4.)
Agency Response: "With regard to this finding there is an important distinction between the State Retirement Commission proper (the "Commission") and the Retirement and Benefit Services Division ("Division"). The Division is responding to this finding as the Agency; however, the Division has limited, if any, authority over the Commission with regard to its approval of travel expenses for Commission members or, in the alternative, implementation of regulations governing such travel and expenses. Pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec. 5-155a, any such authority is placed squarely on the Commission. Saying that, the Director has met with the Chair of the Commission and the two actuaries to discuss the concerns expressed in this finding and to recommend to the actuaries to use the government established rate for their hotel stays and airfare. Additionally, the Division will recommend to the Regulation Subcommittee of the Commission that it meet and promulgate criteria for the reimbursement of "per diems" and travel expenses for Commission members since there appears to be no State guidelines that apply to non-employee Commission members."
*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
Prudence Crandall takes her spot in the Capitol
Reporter Jackie Majerus wrote this story:*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com