February 8, 2008

Schools likely to see hefty spending hike

The Board of Education's preliminary spending plan seeks 7.1 percent more funding, with the vast majority of the extra money needed for the schools to keep doing what they’re doing now.It is eyeing $103.3 million in the next fiscal year instead of the $96 million it received this time around.
School officials said they push pretty hard to get City Hall to go along with the spending hike.
“It isn’t a wish list. It’s an actual need,” said Tom O’Brien, who chairs the school board’s finance committee.
As part of the proposed increase, the finance panel is considering the creation of a handful of new positions, including two psychologists, four assistant principals, a math coach and a special education teacher.Its members are also eyeing a part-time communications coordinator, an online substitute teacher program, more after-school help for students, classroom libraries for O'Connell School and other initiatives aimed at improving the district's educational offerings.Nothing has been approved by the committee, the school board or the city's Board of Finance yet.
School Superintendent Philip Streifer said the initial spending plan “really sets the stage” to improve on the district’s already admirable performance in educating students who often come from impoverished backgrounds.
“What’s been put in place has worked,” he said, adding that the programs in place should be rolled forward.
Just staying in place, though, would require about $5.9 million more, officials said. That’s enough to push up the budget by 6.2 percent.
The problem is that special education costs are expected to rise 20 percent or more, the tab for health insurance may rise by 10 percent, transportation expenses are soaring, utility bills are likely to go up by 19 percent, and other items are also increasing.
So bolstering the district’s education efforts means even more spending.
Streifer said with No Child Left Behind standards getting more strict and poverty rising among students, the district has “this huge hill to get over” that requires more services.
“We don’t have a choice anymore” except to hike the budget, O’Brien said.
Streifer said that state education aid has gone up enough to cover most of the extra money needed – if city leaders agree not to use the education aid to hold down property taxes.
One of the items that board members hope to fund is the addition of four assistant principals at some of the larger elementary schools, a move that would cost $500,000.
Streifer said that the principals of those schools spend far too much time dealing with discipline problems and special education issues rather than overseeing instructional efforts.
O’Brien said that the assistant principals at the middle and high schools spend 90 percent of their time on discipline issues. Principals shouldn’t to do the same, he said.
The new positions are important, O’Brien said.
“I don’t know how the people at Stafford and Hubbell can deal on a day to day basis,” O’Brien said, citing two schools that might get assistant principals if the budget passes.
The committee intends to take action at its next meeting at noon on Monday, Feb. 25 at the Board of Education building.



*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

A communications coordinator?
Vice principals at elementary schools?
When the district has no foreign language until high school and NO orchestra at all?
What we "need" is to get rid of Tom O'Brien.

Anonymous said...

when was the last time that O/Brien saw a budget increase that he didn't like, for the Board of Education that is.
when is the last time that the board of ed reccomended a more efficient manner of delivering their services rather than throwing more of my tax dollars at everything?
new schools shoved down our throats, another yearly influx of new and duplicative positions, subsidized luncheons and golden handshakes paid for with our tax dollars.
Time to stop these O'brien, Doyle budget charades and let the taxpayers - us - breath a bit instead of continuing to suffer the choke-hold of educational funding. they need to actually practice what they teach - responsibility.

Anonymous said...

let's see, money for the gifted, money for the poor, 2 new schools and let;s buy up all of the property that we believe to be blighted - ooops forgot, that will be IN ADDITION to the request for a 7.1% Board of Education budget increase this year; is this being proposed by O'Brien for a bigger increase or is he trying to just make the city look bad? woe is Bristol with pompous jerks like this making decisions for us.

Anonymous said...

TOM O'BRIEN ANOTHER LEONE & WARD.

Anonymous said...

For those that want to select the Park street site, keep in mind that this would add 5-7 million dollars to the cost, just for land acqusition.
This equals a one time 4% increase in the total city budget.
Factor in loss of tax revenue and additional construction cost brought about by delays, and the cost goes way up!!!

The 7.1% will be reduced, Bristol will languish, and the middle and upper middle class will not want to come to Bristol.


And, YOUR property value will be affected, negatively.

Anonymous said...

Hey ..... you gotta keep giving those teachers more and more money every year .

The cost of Condoms keeps going up , and who wants a bunch of pregnant teenagers in school ??

Anonymous said...

WTF??? Condoms? What does this even mean?

Anonymous said...

Hiring these ass-principals is a horrible way to blow our tax dollars. The education mafia is going to kill us!