When state Rep. Frank Nicastro tossed some junk mail in the trash last week, he probably didn’t think much about it.
City Councilor Ken Cockayne said he certainly wasn’t thinking about recycling mandates when he winged an empty honey bottle in his garbage.
And city Councilor Mike Rimcoski said he, too, threw junk mail into his trash can. An aerosal can found its way into the barrel as well, but the councilor pinned the blame for that on his wife.
All of them fessed up after a Hartford television station dug through their rubbish barrels recently – perhaps violating a city ordinance in the process – and confronted them for a story that will apparently air next week.
"I apologize for putting junk mail in my trash," said Nicastro, a Democrat who is also a city councilor. "I'll try to do better."
The city-issued trash cans put out at the curb in front of each of the six city councilors’ homes – and Mayor Art Ward’s – were pawed through for evidence that glass, metal, plastic or paper that should have been recycled was instead lumped in with everyday debris.
It appears that all of them violated recycling rules to at least some degree.
"We are human beings," Ward said, and make mistakes.
“I plead guilty,” Rimcoski confessed. He said it was more convenient to throw his junk mail in the trash than put it in the blue recycling bin that gets put out every two weeks.
George Wallace, the assistant public works director, said that city crews routinely tag barrels where recycling is found so that residents will recycle properly in the future.
But, he said, they haven’t checked on political leaders specifically.
“None of our people found it,” Wallace said.
Ward said that everyone in town, including City Hall’s bosses, could do better recycling.
In fact, the city has a pilot program in place that aims to increase dramatically the amount of material that is recycled.
About 900 residents – 2 percent of the city – got large recycling bins that can be emptied by the same kind of one-armed trucks that are used for garbage cans. They were told to throw all of their recyclables in the new barrels.
Wallace said that recycling rates shot up 97 percent in the targeted area, producing so much extra recycling that the regional recycling agency posted its best month ever in January almost solely because of more recycling from that one little area of southeastern Bristol.
Ward and Nicastro said that Bristol’s success with the single stream recycling test probably prompted Channel 61 to dig through its leaders’ garbage to check for violations.
City Councilor Kevin McCauley pointed out that none of the council members or Ward live in the recycling test area.
Public Works Director Walter Veselka said the city’s anti-scavenging ordinance prohibits anyone from rooting around in other peoples’ garbage.
The Press considered checking for recycling violations by municipal leaders earlier this winter, but chose not to do it because of concerns that it could lead to criminal charges. There were also worry about safety and violating peoples' privacy.
Still, it’s unlikely anyone will pursue charges against the station’s personnel, officials said.
Wallace said he hopes the recycling flap will shine a light on the need to recycle.
“A lot of people just don’t quite understand it,” Wallace said.
The city has plenty of incentive to encourage recycling.
It forks over $65.50 per ton to burn trash at the Covanta incinerator in Bristol, but only shells out only $33.50 per ton to have its recyclables processed. In short, it costs about half as much to get rid of recyclables as it does to deal with garbage.
For taxpayers, that means every item recycled saves money. If the whole town recycled at the same rate as the residents of the pilot program area, the annual savings would easily top $100,000.
Still, everyone involved recognizes the system will never be perfect.
Cockayne said that among his violations was throwing out “a small piece of unused tin” that he never thought would be on the recyclable list.
He said that he’s shredded his junk mail for a long time – taking it to the office to run it through the machine – because he worried that if he put it in the trash, private information could wind up in the wrong hands.
Now that his garbage has been raided, Cockayne said, he knows that was a good idea.
Nicastro said that the incident highlights his own efforts to get state legislation enacted that would protect Social Security numbers better. He said the violation of privacy that comes from digging through trash shows how vulnerable everyone is.
Ward said he didn’t know exactly what he did wrong yet. He added, though, that he recycles regularly."Maybe somebody put stuff in our trash," Ward joked.
Here's what recycled in Bristol:
Materials Collected:
Clean glass and metal food containers
Plastics #1 and # 2: (Please check the bottom of the container for the recycle symbol and number)#1 (PET -polyethylene terephthalate) is typically soda, liquor, cooking oil, and other transparent liquid food containers. #2 (HDPE -high density polyethylene) is typically 1 gallon milk jugs, spring water, detergent, and bleach containers. *Except those that contained motor oil, pesticides, antifreeze or toxic fluids.*Plastics should be rinsed, flattened, and placed in the recycle bin with metal and glass food containers.
Newspapers/magazines/catalogues/junk mail/phone books/soft cover books - place in brown paper bags (or a separate recycle bin).
Place paper bags on top of recycle bin/pails. Shredded paper can also be recycled, please place it in a paper bag.
Paper milk/juice cartons and Juice boxes - Remove straws and caps, rinse, and flatten. Place in recycle bin/pails with metal and glass food containers. Corrugated cardboard - flatten, cut to 3' x 3' maximum, place on top of recycling bins/pails under newspapers or on edge between recycling buckets. Do not tie or tape. (Please do not use boxes for holding trash.)
For more details about what’s acceptable to recycle, please see these links:
*******
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com
26 comments:
They should get charged with the violation just like anyone else would. Why should the fact that they are TV news people protect them from breaking the law? If you don't charge them with the offense then you are setting a precident - no one can get charged if they scrounge through someone's garbage. An ordinance like this isn't an "at your discretion" rule.
McCauley - get your own shredder. $20 at Staples. Stop using Fire Department equipment for personal use.
I seem to remember it printed somewhere that the plastic bags we get from the grocery store are not for the recycle bin. Is this correct?
Ken Cockayne is the one who shreds his junk mail at the office. And since it'his private office, he only has to answer to himself.
McCauley is NOT using fire equipment for personal use.
Plastic grocery store bags can't go in the recycling bins. They can, however, be taken back to most grocery stores for recycling. The big stores all have collection points up front somewhere where you can stuff the used plastic bags.
Public Works Director Walter Veselka said the city’s anti-scavenging ordinance prohibits anyone from rooting around in other peoples’ garbage.
.......Still, it’s unlikely anyone will pursue charges against the station’s personnel, officials said.
I agree with the first poster.
If a resident went scavenging through city counselors garbage for recycle items and turned over their findings to the media, the resident would get charged.
What makes station personnel exempt from this law?
I'll be furious with this administration if they allow people to get away with breaking this ordinance. Who is the City protecting anyway? The TV stations or the residents of this town?
My mistake - I just re-read the story. Didn't mean to blame McCauley for using Fire Dept equipment. It was Cockayne that brings his stuff to work to shred.
Sorry Kevin - my mistake.
I noted my mistake - sorry McCauley - I misread the story. It's Cockayne that brings his stuff to work to shred.
OH MY GOSH!!!! I CAN'T BELIEVE THEY ARE MAKING THESE DRASTIC MISTAKES THAT COULD HAVE SUCH SERIOUS IMPLICATIONS ON THE FUTURE OF OUR CITY!!!! IMPEACH THEM ALL!
Fox 61 should get a life. This is stupid.
And I agree that they should get charged with breaking the law.
How do we know if what the Public Works inspectors find is remaining confidential? What if they come across something personal? Who is policing them?
Government workers of all sorts have access to confidential information. They know they have an obligation to protect it. Those who violate that have, on occasion, been charged with crimes.
Who made this recycling policy with inspections and penalties for trashing recyclables? Was it public works that made the policy? did the city council approve it?
According to the state Department of Environmental Protection, "in the late 1980's, the State legislature passed the mandatory recycling laws which required recycling of 25% of the state’s solid waste stream by January 1, 1991. To meet this goal, 9 items were designated which could not be disposed of and had to be recycled instead. These items include: glass food & beverage containers, used motor oil, vehicle (lead-acid) batteries, scrap metal, corrugated cardboard, newspaper, metal food & beverage containers, leaves, white office paper (private residences exempt).
On May 1, 1996, nickel-cadmium batteries were added to the list of mandatory recyclables. Instead of being recycled curbside, these batteries are recycled at retailers, businesses, municipalities and other sites though a take-back program sponsored by the battery manufacturers. As of October 1998, grass clippings were banned from solid waste disposal facilities."
So, fundamentally, it was the state that made the laws that Bristol operates under when it comes to recycling.
Steve-
The state sets the general recycling policies that you wrote, but this has to be a city thing, I know of no other city that inspects garbage and threatens to fine citizens who mix recycling materials into the garbage.
People don't seem to understand.
Besides an environmental value to all, there is an economic value to the community.
Is it that difficult to comply?
Why shouldn't the city do what it has to do to enforce the laws?
Otherwise, why have them?
Come on Steve..... Do a story on what happens to the recycled waste that has no resale value???? It goes to the dump......Check it out!!!! It is another garbage money making scheme... Really check it out!!!
What dump?
eh...slow news day.
Can I rat out my neighbors recyclying??
Please?
Why should McCauley get his own shredder afterall he uses the one at the fire station all the time, just like his "knee" injury he is milking the city on because he banged it on the door. Give us all a break McCauley you whimp.
Ok my family drinks to cases of poland spring water a week. Have you tried to put 48 empty water bottles in that little container they provided? I the little container overflowing with plastic bottles and the big blue paper container with hardly anything in it. Am I the only one with this problem?
recycling should be done every week i follow the law with what should be and what should not be put in to the blue barrels of which i have 3 of. by the second week they are overflowing. why not pick up every week?
I would like to know what to do with the increasing amounts of other types of plastic containers. When you're serious about recycling, it is very frustrating to see the number of items that you can't recycle curbside here in Bristol--everything from yogurt cups to the thin plastic food/produce containers. When will these types of plastic, which are harmful to the environment,either be more easily recycled or be banned? Also, with the new recycling system here in Bristol, will these items be thrown in too?
First poster ... what makes you think Mr. McCauley shreds his trash at the fire department? It's disgusting to see people giving the impression things are being done that are NOT being done. I do believe the chief would certainly know if Mr. McCauley spent his time shredding his trash since his office is RIGHT THERE! It would be sooo obvious! Get your facts straight!
Actually, my apologies to the first poster. It's the 9:19 a.m. poster that needs to be corrected. Mr. McCauley does NOT shred anything personal at the firehouse and I have firsthand knowledge. Apparently your information regarding his injury is secondhand, because you're off the mark. I guess an injury requiring surgery is not a legitimate injury to you. The only whimp I see is the one you see when you look in the mirror!
Nicastro opposed a deposit on non-carbonated (water) containers.
I don't think anyone should be going into anyone's trash especially channel 61. Talk about giving people ideas! Stupids!
To the poster whose family sucks down cases of Poland Spring water every week... try tap water, or a filter on your faucet, if you must. You are really adding a lot to the waste stream by using all those bottles when a re-usable cup and the faucet would do just fine. Maybe you could use the money you save on all that bottled water on something special.
Post a Comment