March 14, 2010

Rosenthal has a track record

Here's a little story about Jonathan Rosenthal.

*******
Copyright 2010. All rights reserved.
Contact Steve Collins at scollins@bristolpress.com

21 comments:

  1. Rosenthal will win again. Council not smart enough to figh him. Enough said.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wish Rosenthal would work as hard at promoting the city as he works at promoting himself.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This story was a joke. Nothing of any substance in it. Just a fluff story for Rosenthal. Why nothing about any accomplishments Rosenthal has done? Most likely because it would have been a very short story. 16 yrs and not much to show for it.....execpt sucking the taxpayer dry for his pay!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ward has chosen to attach himself to the wrong person. Jonathan will take Ward down with him. Another lazy Union worker!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Latt mayor wanted him out, Council didn't.

    This Council wants him out, mayor doesn't.


    Go figure.

    ReplyDelete
  6. right versus wrongMarch 15, 2010 at 9:54 AM

    if you reviewed the last council meeting, you would have noticed that ward's position was that the council went about it in the wrong way, nothing to do with either support or lack of support for jonathan, and would have been putting the city in jeporady of being sued.
    too bad that this council feels that they know it all, could cost us some big bucks down the road.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 9:54

    Ward was a big and vocal supporter of Rosenthal last time when he was up for reappointment.

    Why?

    Other than politics?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Rosenthal is Ward's buddy, he won't get rid of him. Just like Ward won't get rid of the Emergency manager - who isn't even in CT. Taxpayer money beinng wasted on Ward's buddies.

    ReplyDelete
  9. At the council meeting, Jonathan had the obviously educated, scientist-businessman, industrial park gentlemen speak up on his behalf. Speaking out against Jonathan was Bristol's one and not only, still bitter after all these years, gadfly Ed Dutko. Game over. Jonathan stays. Do we need to even discuss this matter any further.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 9:28

    Hope you are right!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jonathan is good at "Talk".

    Results are a diferent story.

    ReplyDelete
  12. You cant call what we have a council. There more like a mistake by the voters.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Please bring back evaluations. Give Rosenthal some clear measureable goals. And when he doesn't/won't deliver on those goals - adios!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Too bad that those that have challenged him did not get the support they needed.

    In fact, they were the ones that suffered.

    Crazy system.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Rosenthal couldn't ask for a better fluff PR piece.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 8:10 - too bad that those who went after rosenthal had no idea what they were doing and ran with their tails between their legs when rosenthal called their bluff by going and asking that the thing be held in front of the public. maybe someday it will be done right and for the right reasons but these council smucks ain't gonna be the ones to get it - they are too stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  17. What made McCauley change his mind from a few years back?

    Or is he just a slow learner?

    ReplyDelete
  18. 11:00 - anyone who makes mccauley feel important changes his mind on anything - some day he might be able to think on his own - if she lets him.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Strunz 9:28 That was a test to see if you paid some one to get your ged.

    ReplyDelete
  20. 1:09

    Guess you know YOUR name.

    ReplyDelete
  21. What's with the "pudgy" comment near the beginning? Unless he's so fat he physcially can't move, I don't see what bearing that has on his performance as economic development coordinator. And the "targeted by some" sentence is really shady. Who are these people? Fox News does this all the time. "Some people say President Obama's a baby-killing socialist." Not cool, man.

    ReplyDelete

Comments will not be posted unless they contain the writer's full name. I will read unsigned comments but I will no longer post them.